4 ms·
A few remarks: * Syntactic sugar for nested loops is welcome! * I would have preferred a comparison with https://github.com/Shinmera/for/ https://github.com/S
by a-french-anon 2y ago
A few remarks:
* Syntactic sugar for nested loops is welcome!
* I would have preferred a comparison with https://github.com/Shinmera/for/ https://github.com/Shinmera/for/, as it's nearer in concept than loop/iterate.
* Eschewing collection is a mistake in my opinion. Yes, you can do your own with (let ((ret)) (for ... (push it ret)) (nreverse ret)), but it'll be verbose.
As other said, it's a very Scheme-y vision of looping, which has simplicity/purity/explicitness advantages but lacks in pragmatism. Personally, I firmly stay in the iterate team, even with its issues.