3 ms·
That's not necessarily a hole. Maybe Employee #8 was hired before #10 but had a later start date, hence a different issue date.
by I_AM_A_SMURF 2y ago
That's not necessarily a hole. Maybe Employee #8 was hired before #10 but had a later start date, hence a different issue date.
- jonathankoren 2y agoYeah, it’s an “issue date” someone just didn’t go across the room and get it. Also, the early employee numbers are famously semibogus. Jobs was 0 because he hated coming after Woz, who was 1.