> I would imagine it's massive. It has to be massive. There is no other way to manage a 70% production swing in as short as a couple minutes and not have the g

> I would imagine it's massive. It has to be massive. There is no other way to manage a 70% production swing in as short as a couple minutes and not have the grid go dark. Which then begs the question of how green the batteries are over decades. We've picked the least reliable energy source and intellectually anchored ourselves to it - then we don't talk about how we actually keep the lights on 24/7. It's kind of nuts.