My disagreement is with what OpenAI asserts "Open" to mean in this context. Appropriating freely-available content for a privately-owned and commercially sold p

My disagreement is with what OpenAI asserts "Open" to mean in this context. Appropriating freely-available content for a privately-owned and commercially sold product is not "Open" at all. You are taking information and furnishing it to someone else expressly as a business. I know everyone has complained about OpenAI misunderstanding their own nom-de-plume, but this extends to how they view the world. It's conceptual and literal openwashing, and you don't need any OSI definitions to understand why it's wrong.