I'm with you. The thing I find baffling is how anyone with any logical sense finds chatGPT useful for anything that requires precision, like math and code. If y

I'm with you. The thing I find baffling is how anyone with any logical sense finds chatGPT useful for anything that requires precision, like math and code. If you do indeed follow the caveats that the LLM companies require placing alongside any output: to not rely on it, and verify it yourself, then you already have to be skilled enough to detect problems, and if you are that skilled, the only way to check the output is to do the work again yourself! So, umm, where's the savings? You can't not do the work to check the output, and a novice just can't check at all... I have personally been brought into a coding project created by a novice using GPT4, and I was completely blown away by how bad the code was. I was asked to review the code because the novice dev just couldn't get the required functionality to work fully. Turns out that since he didn't understand the deployment platform, or networking, or indeed the language he was using, that there was actually no possible way to accomplish the task with the approach him and the LLM had "decided" on. He had been working on that problem for three weeks. I leveraged 2 off-the-shelf tools and had a solve from scratch in under a full day's work, including integration testing.