3 ms·
>before Softbank bought Sprint, they didn't have the capital to upgrade their 2G/3G network to LTE, much less consider a merger with T-Mobile. I think both of
by Benjammer 2y ago
>before Softbank bought Sprint, they didn't have the capital to upgrade their 2G/3G network to LTE, much less consider a merger with T-Mobile.
I think both of us can be right at the same time though. Just because they had problems before the SoftBank acquisition as well doesn't necessarily make what I'm saying unreasonable. There was still sentiment in 2013 when SB closed the deal that regulators would not have approved of Sprint acquiring T Mobile [0], despite the struggles going on at Sprint at the time (that you describe). Sprint was definitely putting together a bid to acquire T Mobile, WSJ reported on it [1].
As you yourself said, Sprint was _dying_ at the time of the SB acquisition, but as far as large firms go, they were far from bankrupt yet. SoftBank simply twisted the dagger and then presented the corpse to congress instead of the dying patient.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2014/2/4/5376824/fcc-chief-reportedly-skeptical-on-t-mobile-sprint-merger https://www.theverge.com/2014/2/4/5376824/fcc-chief-reported...
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303293604579256561000513396 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303293604579256...
- Aloha 2y agoI remember saying at one point to my operations manager at Ericsson, "how does anyone make money in this business?" he laughed and said "I have no idea". I cannot explain how poorly managed Sprint was, it'd take me an essay to just explain the various dysfunctions I saw there. That said, it did improve some once Softbank bought them.