The graph they chose to use in the article has to be one of the main poster childs for 'correlation does not mean causation'. I don't know what's worse, not ad

The graph they chose to use in the article has to be one of the main poster childs for 'correlation does not mean causation'. I don't know what's worse, not adjusting for purchasing power, or not adjusting for country size. Also targeting 100GB screams 'writer had an agenda' to me. My screen on time is absolutely atrocious and I still rarely get over 20gb a month. I'm guessing the stats must change if you choose a number that fits in most plans defaults.