4 ms·
In this context, I am referring to the bill you'd get from AWS, not your internet utility provider.
by adamwong246 2y ago
In this context, I am referring to the bill you'd get from AWS, not your internet utility provider.
- robertlagrant 2y agoYouTube achieves this, but the wider web never has very successfully.
- adamwong246 2y agoI consider the "host your own software" approach akin to being a linux user, so I am already accustomed to being in a minority. People love frictionless UX which the FOSS lifestyle really can never provide. So perhaps we can settle for a solution that meets the needs of enthusiasts, even if the masses choose "junk".
- robertlagrant 2y agoI tend to agree, but maybe I'm talking about something slightly different. I was meaning that when I watch a YouTube video, if the creator has monetised it then they get a tiny amount of money, which enables them to do more videos. The Web in general doesn't have anything like that.
- waterheater 2y agoTrue. You should look into Project Xanadu, which was created with seventeen original rules, one of which is the following: >Every document can contain a royalty mechanism at any desired degree of granularity to ensure payment on any portion accessed, including virtual copies ("transclusions") of all or part of the document.