3 ms·
Right, I definitely don't deny that strides have been made. However, I'm using the latest version of Plasma on my laptop and the "fit and finish" is still not a
by byproxy 2y ago
Right, I definitely don't deny that strides have been made. However, I'm using the latest version of Plasma on my laptop and the "fit and finish" is still not as good as base GNOME, I'd say.
- moooo99 2y agoI found Gnomes fit and finish very superficial. Yeah, if you use Gnome standard apps or Gnome circle apps everything fits really nicely. As soon as you dive into extensions, stuff gets wonky and breaks. I find this particularly annoying because Gnome does lack some stuff I really like, where I have to resort to extensions that frequently break between updates. On KDE you can also use extensions which are equally wonky, but KDE offers so much more out of the box options that I find myself needing far fewer extensions. Also, KDE is much quicker on implementing stuff like VRR or HDR support which Gnome is still lacking. But at the same time, KDEs implementation is still lacking in some areas. While I personally like the "move (relatively) fast and deliver early results" mentality, being on a semi rolling release like Fedora I'm not stuck with the broken state for very long. In that sense, I can understand why people may be annoyed with partially implemented features when they're stuck with them for a long version lifecycle.