3 ms·
It seems like it should hallucinate less, as it directly quates, but nope, it still halucinates just as much and then gives a quote that directly contradicts it
by Euphorbium 2y ago
It seems like it should hallucinate less, as it directly quates, but nope, it still halucinates just as much and then gives a quote that directly contradicts its statement.
- jamesbrady 2y agoElician here! Accuracy and supportedness of the claims made in Elicit are two of the most central things we focus on—it's a shame it didn't work as well as we'd like in this case. I'd appreciate knowing more about the specifics so we can understand and improve
- Euphorbium 2y agohttps://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dta.2950 https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/do... elicit summarises this paper abstract: “Psilocybin was present at 0.47 wt% in the mycelium.” Actual quote from the abstract: “ No tryptamines were detected in the basidiospores, and only psilocin was present at 0.47 wt.% in the mycelium.” It does not differentiate between psilocin and psilocybin, those are two different molecules.