Well, surely buying a washing machine is not that frequent, and in not-too-dense cities like those common in Scandinavia they might be enough shops who became p

Well, surely buying a washing machine is not that frequent, and in not-too-dense cities like those common in Scandinavia they might be enough shops who became packet stations, I doubt they can be enough in denser cities like NY, Tokyo, Moscow etc though, however even if we can somewhat adapt to such little changes, the point remains: cities can't evolve. How can adapt for instance to the Green New Deal? Not small cities composed of little buildings but large ones composed of mid/high rise buildings? The point in the end is: we can adapt to many things and still living, but it's a smart idea do this or that only because we can somewhat adapt? Beware, the future of cities is the smart city, those with no more private ownership, whose where anyone can only move with some transporting services depending on it's schedule and so on. Maybe we can adapt, but it's a good thing?