4 ms·
maybe a caveat here. Also: citation needed! Using photos is only perfectly legal if this use is within the licence agreement of the photos. as I understand it
by polotics 2y ago
maybe a caveat here. Also: citation needed!
Using photos is only perfectly legal if this use is within the licence agreement of the photos. as I understand it using a picture of somebody you took on the street is allowed in the sense that you can print this picture unmodified that's public domain. However taking this picture you took on the streets and make a deep fake porn out of the picture of that person is definitely not within the licence that public pictures grant you.
if you take a picture of my daughter riding her bike and make a fake porn out of it with her face, don't worry I'm on your case...
Same for any picture taken by a paparazzi of some prominent figure actress for example these are all licenced, good luck with the lawyers...
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/scarlett-johansson-sues-ai-generator-175439964.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANFxfhbQc2WneizwdelNXhinF00HUA0RAbuVaoPn-l4nBCznP0AGA_rwMXKlhe6TPCJ9Bz0x0O0PhznKTzT_b0n8Uw4bc0dS5vdk-6opJjjI3Cp-35hxvN2D_D5-Q_DnNCVNRpD74R4Zt1kQutWDpLj0zivso6XzCoPpt5plbU_l https://finance.yahoo.com/news/scarlett-johansson-sues-ai-ge...
- superkuh 2y agoYou're implicit assumption of commercial use here makes everything you've said invalid in most use cases discussed in this thread.