At this point I wonder if I should tell you explaining your statistics are incorrect. It's actually worse than you point out. Let's say you have a 1% of gettin

At this point I wonder if I should tell you explaining your statistics are incorrect. It's actually worse than you point out. Let's say you have a 1% of getting hired. And getting 2 offers is still getting hired, right? So the odds of getting hired after N interviews is: 1 - (1 - P)^N. (because you have to be in the "not hired" 99% bucket every time) For 5 interviews with P=1% => 4.9% For 10 interviews with P=1% => 9.6% For 20 interviews => 18.2% 50 interviews => 39.5% It takes more than 68 interviews to get to a 50% chance of getting hired. And of course, the number of interviews can be infinite and you still won't have 100% odds.