5 ms·
What's new (versus when the story broke years ago) is: > A 47-page report summarizing Ebury's 15-year history said that the infection hitting the kernel.org ne
by rezonant 2y ago
What's new (versus when the story broke years ago) is:
> A 47-page report summarizing Ebury's 15-year history said that the infection hitting the kernel.org network began in 2009, two years earlier than the domain was previously thought to have been compromised.
I think you grok that, but I don't think the title is clickbait.
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y agoI read the arstechnica post and didn't grok that at all; thanks for explaining. I spent the whole article wondering what prompted them to report on something that happened over a decade ago now.
- rezonant 2y agoIt definitely buries the lede and is overcomplicated