4 ms·
I'm not sure I would call it an "interesting stance", as it's barely a stance and not at all interesting IMO . It's what they think is legally required to accep
by kbenson 2y ago
I'm not sure I would call it an "interesting stance", as it's barely a stance and not at all interesting IMO . It's what they think is legally required to accept code given their license.
If there's a chance the providence of the code is tainted, the only thing that makes sense that doesn't cause the possibility of immense problems later is to reject it.
- lillecarl 2y agoYep, the world isn't always black and white. If I were to use Copilot to autocomplete the code I would've written myself (which is VERY often the case) I don't think it'd fall under this policy unless made overly obvious in some kind of rebellion act
- pseudalopex 2y agoI think the policy means what it says.
- LightFog 2y agoThe old ‘You made this?…I made this’ meme comes to mind https://a.pinatafarm.com/440x959/e59eef9670/you-made-thisi-made-this.jpg https://a.pinatafarm.com/440x959/e59eef9670/you-made-thisi-m...