> In fact all forms of rebellion can be spun as terrorism. Sure. But not all forms of rebellion (or state violence) are terrorism. If rebels (or the state in q

> In fact all forms of rebellion can be spun as terrorism. Sure. But not all forms of rebellion (or state violence) are terrorism. If rebels (or the state in question) are focused on attacking and killing enemy combatants, it's not really terrorism, while if they are focusing on indiscriminately targeting civilians, it is. Words have meaning. Not all violence is the same. EDIT: Even in the most violent of contexts (war), humans have collectively agreed that some forms of violence ("war crimes") are less acceptable than others; saying things like "violence is violence" could be seen as support to the "anything goes" approach to war (which I'm sure you don't support).