That's a good point I forgot to mention. It really depends on your subject matter. I put a clip up supporting why I think LLMs are good for brainstorming from

That's a good point I forgot to mention. It really depends on your subject matter. I put a clip up supporting why I think LLMs are good for brainstorming from Marc Andreeson about this topic in case your interested "Marc Andreessen says with the right prompting, you can unlock the latent super genius in AI models" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2yN4IG8UYA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2yN4IG8UYA And here's my comment on another site to a pro novelist who suddenly discovered Claude wrote like a genius who posits that Anthropic deliberatly cripples Claude's writing ability because they don't want to scare writers suddenly, they want to ease them into it I disagree. Your supernatural scenes triggered words an analysis from higher quality writers and commenters in the training data. If you were writing about bass fishing it would likely not impress you with it's writing. You can try something like this as an experiment. In other words it's good at some writing and bad at others, depending on the training data. I'd love to be proven wrong, like a gripping story about bass fishing might be interesting.