4 ms·

I get your point. Your view is widespread. The war is over, video has won. I know I have to accept this. It just makes me sad, because there's no way around th

I get your point. Your view is widespread. The war is over, video has won. I know I have to accept this. It just makes me sad, because there's no way around the fact it just takes _longer_ on a time-per-idea basis to consume content this way, no matter what I do, whether I use the AI generated transcript, use the speed up fourier transform feature at 2x, skim it with scrobbing time jumps, or whatnot. PS: Blog posts support photographs. A slide show did not need to be a video. I'm OK with videos that really make use of the video medium -- this is not one of those.

aspenmayer 2y ago
I agree with you on pretty much all your points here, I just think that for the kind of slice of life content that this “video essay” has an audience for, there just isn’t a similar audience for if it were a blog post. I guess the shift to a semi-professional approach to content creation of this sort is driven by content creators going where the audience is, which is overwhelmingly on the side of video. It’s just easier to build an audience on YouTube and support that with Patreon I suppose. I think the kind of content you’re looking for is probably on Substack and its competitors, but the major benefit to consumers and competitive advantage of YouTube is the recommendation algorithm and built-in user base of people with a Google/ YouTube account.
- galdosdi 2y ago
  Right, I agree -- much of the web has turned into slow superficial low info density high entertainment density video stuff. I kinda thought the whole point of HN was not to give in to the superficial wave, and focus on more information dense, less superficial, technically or intellectually interesting content. Again, I don't have an issue with video as a form, but with low info density high entertainment density video. It's like a fast food version of what I want. HN is for steak content not McDonald's content

aspenmayer 2y ago

I agree with you on pretty much all your points here, I just think that for the kind of slice of life content that this “video essay” has an audience for, there just isn’t a similar audience for if it were a blog post. I guess the shift to a semi-professional approach to content creation of this sort is driven by content creators going where the audience is, which is overwhelmingly on the side of video. It’s just easier to build an audience on YouTube and support that with Patreon I suppose. I think the kind of content you’re looking for is probably on Substack and its competitors, but the major benefit to consumers and competitive advantage of YouTube is the recommendation algorithm and built-in user base of people with a Google/ YouTube account.

galdosdi 2y ago
Right, I agree -- much of the web has turned into slow superficial low info density high entertainment density video stuff. I kinda thought the whole point of HN was not to give in to the superficial wave, and focus on more information dense, less superficial, technically or intellectually interesting content. Again, I don't have an issue with video as a form, but with low info density high entertainment density video. It's like a fast food version of what I want. HN is for steak content not McDonald's content