> "this is representative of how the entire employment relationship will go." Seems like it's great signal of how the company thinks, and will behave. Not nec

> "this is representative of how the entire employment relationship will go." Seems like it's great signal of how the company thinks, and will behave. Not necessarily that they'll put all employees under video surveillance, but if they think that interview thing is a good idea, I'd guess probably they'll do numerous other things along the same line of thinking. Occam's Razor possibilities: 1. The company is normally very enlightened and thoughtful and fair, and has a very subtle and nuanced rationale for why they're coming across as invasive and overbearing in this one narrow instance, and their reasons in this bad first-impressions instance (when they should be thinking about first impressions) were simply somehow not explained. 2. The company is going to behave like a jerk.