3 ms·
> And, frankly, you did not even understand that the document was an accusation. This fundamental error didn't give me confidence, to be honest. The document I
by runarberg 2y ago
> And, frankly, you did not even understand that the document was an accusation. This fundamental error didn't give me confidence, to be honest.
The document I linked was a testimony relating to accusations made by the UN general assembly. You incorrectly stated I cited it as a judgement, but I did not. I did however cite an ICJ judgement (Case 131) later which ruled Israel’s border wall illegal under international law, which was cited in the accusations for more general human rights violations (A/RES/77/247).
I understand what I cited, and I stand by my words. I’m however not that smart, and perhaps I failed to convey the purpose of each document I cited. Sorry for that.