4 ms·
> The EU estimates that in a 80% renewable grid you need approx 30% storage capacity. The number I first gave(CO2 per kWh) is when Germany was at more than 80
by Kuinox 2y ago
> The EU estimates that in a 80% renewable grid you need approx 30% storage capacity.
The number I first gave(CO2 per kWh) is when Germany was at more than 80% renewable, at the time I wrote the comment.
As we can all see the 'low carbon' target you set yourself in your example is not enough.
- j-pb 2y agoThe target I set in my example was 100% Renewables. No carbon is not enough for zero carbon? Btw the EU wants 80% renewables by 2050, that includes coal guzzlers like poland. Germany wants 100% renewables by 2035. So you're barking at the wrong tree.
- Kuinox 2y agoSo you say Germany is already doing enough ? The tree I'm barking at kills thousands of European every year by burning coal, and finance anti-nuclear propaganda. https://env-health.org/IMG/pdf/dark_cloud-full_report_final.pdf https://env-health.org/IMG/pdf/dark_cloud-full_report_final.... https://www.ege.fr/sites/ege.fr/files/media_files/German_Interference_Political_Foundations.pdf https://www.ege.fr/sites/ege.fr/files/media_files/German_Int...
- j-pb 2y agoYour pro-nuclear propaganda is just anti-renewable propaganda in a trench-coat. Should germany do more? Yes! Is it great that france spend the last 70 years building 0-CO2 emmision power plants? Yes! Should germany spend its money on the cheapest, most available technology? Yes! Is your nuclear greenwash for new reactors in germany an obvious conservative derailment strategy to delay more investment in renewables? Yes! (you might actually believe this stuff, but german conservative parties that use this dogwhistle certainly don't)