3 ms·
> The ends of the spectrum are clearly immoral, and perfectly OK, respectively. I'd agree that it's probably a spectrum of legal culpability (although IANAL, s
by CoastalCoder 2y ago
> The ends of the spectrum are clearly immoral, and perfectly OK, respectively.
I'd agree that it's probably a spectrum of legal culpability (although IANAL, so...)
But I disagree that the extrema are clearly moral or immoral.
For example, I expect that the private, hand-drawn scenario violates Christian morality.
And I'm guessing there are other moral frameworks that are sincerely held by some persons, and which are okay with the other extremity.
- marcus_holmes 2y agoI'm kinda fascinated by the Christian morality thing - I was raised Anglican and while I no longer believe I still have a fair understanding of the dogma. How does drawing a picture of someone violate that morality? There are realistic pictures (and sculptures) of real people all over our churches. Are these immoral? I think possibly the confusion lies in my framing of the question; I meant drawing a picture of someone at all, not necessarily someone naked or having sex.