5 ms·
My very amateur understanding is that the MAX would have been dead on arrival if it required recertification. It was a marginal bump in fuel efficiency that sti
by everforward 2y ago
My very amateur understanding is that the MAX would have been dead on arrival if it required recertification. It was a marginal bump in fuel efficiency that still lagged behind Aerobus, so their only real marketing strategy was not having to recertify.
Basically either it didn’t require recertification or it wasn’t worth making. I suspect somewhere along the line they realized that wasn’t practical and they either shipped a shoddy project and maybe burned a pile of money or they gave up and definitely burned a smaller but still sizable pile of money.
Probably also some worry that if they didn’t have a competitive smaller plane, they’d lose market share and there’d be even less interest in their next plane.
- idontpost 2y ago[dead]
- salawat 2y ago...Actually it doesn't matter how relatively uncompetitive it would have been in the face of Airbus. Their (Airbus's) waitlist is so bloody long, you'd still have looked longingly at Boeing anyway. Despite that, they made a coscious decision to deceive airlines, pilots, and their regulators. All to "maximize shareholder value". That's what's criminal.
- Spooky23 2y agoExactly. End of the day, poor governance from product inception to execution to operation.