3 ms·

That doesn't mean we pad all the rooms or ban peanuts. Yes, we should care for them but not at the detriment of the other 99%.

• earthling8118 2y ago
  Well, conveniently, this is benefitting the 1% much more than the 99%
  • llm_trw 2y ago
    And a nanny state benefits a different 1% much more than the 99%.
    • fipar 2y ago
      That's a false dilemma.
      • llm_trw 2y ago
        Having seem far too many orgs implode because of that new 1%, no it really isn't. Replacing greed with self-righteousness as the original sin of those in power does not help anyone.
  • bongodongobob 2y ago
    Do you mean the richest 1%? How? Sounds pretty woo woo to me.