>Say it with me... There's no need for the condescension, even if you had actually understood the point. >It uses statistics to generate... I assume most her

>Say it with me... There's no need for the condescension, even if you had actually understood the point. >It uses statistics to generate... I assume most here understand your rudimentary description of how GPT works. My point assumes that LLMs and/or some augmented form of the same continue to improve. If, OTOH, the best we ever do is the current generation of models that hallucinate, require babysitting, and never reach or exceed human capabilities, then my point (and >90% of the discussion around AI's future impact) are non-issues. I suppose I assumed that was obvious.