3 ms·
Why is Cook no Ballmer? Both seem like competent but maligned CEOs who ruthlessly capitalized on their predecessors' innovations, resulting in tremendous cash f
by darkerside 2y ago
Why is Cook no Ballmer? Both seem like competent but maligned CEOs who ruthlessly capitalized on their predecessors' innovations, resulting in tremendous cash flow and short term shareholder value while neglecting to chat a course for creating meaningful user value in new ways in the future.
- Invictus0 2y agoTim Cook grew apple massively since he took over, Ballmer left without growing Microsoft's market cap at all.