3 ms·
I will say Google certainly has the better branding team. I like Gemini, Gems, and so on. “ChatGPT” is quite a clunky mess. OpenAI just feels like a faceless en
by mrcwinn 2y ago
I will say Google certainly has the better branding team. I like Gemini, Gems, and so on. “ChatGPT” is quite a clunky mess. OpenAI just feels like a faceless entity.
All things that could change but seems late in the game at this point. They certainly had the money to be more creative as they came to market.
- ukuina 2y agoOpenAI desperately needs a marketing consult. "GPT4o"? Seriously? Even "GPT4 Omni" is easier in conversation, and that's what the "o" stands for! They severely underestimate the number of casual users they have.
- zarzavat 2y agoOpenAI doesn’t need marketing because everybody knows who’s the best. Same reason that if I asked you what’s the best violin you would say Stradivari, even though you’ve never seen an ad for one. OpenAI could call their model the “[poo emoji] 5000” for all the difference it would make.
- cpeterso 2y agoGoggle “Gemini” is a much better product name than any name OpenAI has, but the Gemini product family could use some structure: Gemini Advanced (“with Ultra 1.0”) Gemini Ultra Gemini Pro Gemini Flash Gemini Nano-1 Gemini Nano-2
- precompute 2y ago"ChatGPT" is like "Google". "Gemini" is never replacing that.
- borgdefense 2y ago[flagged]