5 ms·
We could have a superintelligence in months. 1% catastrophic risk is too large
- PaulHoule 2y agoI am not so impressed with the Turing test. The ability to listen actively and change the subject when your are over your head will get you pretty far in conversation.
- aimonster2 2y agoYes, but you still don't have the front of the brain yet. that's the key.
- signal_space 2y agoidk squealing about exponentials seems like a thing someone whose never seen a sigmoid does…
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- TillE 2y ago> We already have (weak) AGI No. We all intuitively know what AGI means, we've read/seen enough science fiction. It doesn't have to be "superintelligent", but it does need independent agency. None of the recent AI stuff is anything approaching that.