4 ms·
As is often the case these days, the probability that it was an attack is much higher than the conditional probability that it would ever be publicly proven to
by worstspotgain 2y ago
As is often the case these days, the probability that it was an attack is much higher than the conditional probability that it would ever be publicly proven to be if so. The target wouldn't want it disclosed any more than the attacker.
100:1 and you will find takers, though.
- whimsicalism 2y ago100:1 and i’d be better off just investing my cash
- throwup238 2y ago> The target wouldn't want it disclosed any more than the attacker. If it's a cyberattack, the insurance companies involved will absolutely blow the lid open publicly. They're the ones who are going to pay here and they're the ones who have to insure ships in harbors going forward. This wouldn't be some hack like Equifax with hard to demonstrate harm. The insurance companies are going to be on the hook for hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars so they're going to want to prevent anything like this in the future. They're explicitly on the hook for some extreme damages if this happens in the Suez or Panama canal especially.
- kornhole 2y agoImmediately after FSK collapse, Biden vowed to cover it. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-says-federal-government-will-fund-baltimore-bridge-rebuild-2024-03-26/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-says-federal-governme... The insurance companies refused to pay for the Nordstream. https://sputnikglobe.com/20240312/nord-stream-sues-insurance-companies-in-london-court---reports-1117285432.html https://sputnikglobe.com/20240312/nord-stream-sues-insurance... It will be interesting to see how this plays out.