3 ms·
Yeah it's pretty unfortunate. Saying something sucks is such a lack of understanding that things are not static. I guess it's a sure way to be right, because th
by motoxpro 2y ago
Yeah it's pretty unfortunate. Saying something sucks is such a lack of understanding that things are not static. I guess it's a sure way to be right, because there will always be progress and you can look back and say "See I told you!"
- IggleSniggle 2y agoPsh. Things are not static. Progress sucks now. Haven't you heard of enshitification? You can always look back and say, "see? I told you it would suck in the future!" ...why am I feeling to urge to point out that I am only making a joke here and not trying to make an actual counter point, even if one can be made...?
- piloto_ciego 2y agoI commented on this elsewhere, but being a negative Nancy is really a winning strategy. If you’re negative and you get it wrong, nobody cares, get it and right you look like a damn genius. Conversely, if you’re positive and get it wrong, you look like an idiot and if you’re right you’re praised for a good call once. The rational “game theory” choice is to predict calamity.
- motoxpro 2y agoYeah it’s funny that optimism in the long term is optimal and pessimism in the short term is optimal.
- piloto_ciego 2y agoRight, but I think people sometimes get the “what constitutes long term” factor a little bit wrong. I am still talking to a lot of people who say, “what can any of this AI stuff even do?” It’s like, robots you could hold a conversation with effectively didn’t exist 3 years ago and you’re already upset that it’s not a money tree? I think that peoples expectation horizon narrowing down may be the clearest evidence that we’re in the singularity.