3 ms·
1. A single worldwide 3G/4G handset is a difficult proposition. 2. Networks are fiercely competitive against being commoditised. While a single carrier in each
by idspispopd 14y ago
1. A single worldwide 3G/4G handset is a difficult proposition.
2. Networks are fiercely competitive against being commoditised. While a single carrier in each country won't allow for sufficient coverage.
3. Consumer trust for facebook is decreasing, they're less likely to buy into something which they'll perceive as a big brother device.
4. It's a specific novelty device in comparison to everything-goes Android/iOS.
5. Android proves that price matters. Top of line hardware requires a top of line price. (Especially if supporting all 3G/4G implementations.)
6. Many of the services listed aren't internationally available.
7. How does Angry Birds fit into it?
8. How does this make money?
- AlexDanger 14y ago1.) Agree. 2.) Agree. 3.) Perhaps in the blogosphere, its a non issue for the other 99% of users. 4.) Again I think you've got your head in the blogosphere. Try inverting your statement. For a large set of users, iOS/Android are just devices that allow them to use Facebook away from the PC. Easy to see how calling, messaging, photos and games could integrate seamlessly with Facebook. 5.) Perhaps a bit more expensive, or they can just do what device manufacturers do now and market different versions for different regions. Not many people need a phone that is compatible with every single wireless protocol. 6.) Dont understand. 7.) Facebook games? 8.) Pay for handset. Monthly access fee. Whatever. People are used to paying for their phone. If it wasnt for the telcos, this idea might have some traction.