4 ms·
If self-replication really is the holy grail it seems like it'd be easier to have the system set up as a (self-)assembly line than a jack-of-all-trades: Print p
by eschaton 14y ago
If self-replication really is the holy grail it seems like it'd be easier to have the system set up as a (self-)assembly line than a jack-of-all-trades: Print photoresist, etch, drill, pick & place, wave-solder, cut, etc. And doing anything "assembly" will also require intervention without also doing significant robotics work.
It might be straightforward to optimize the number of needed stations to "print" a reasonably-sized PCB that's fully populated and ready to use, though. Particularly if some stations could be combined due to similar hardware and precision needs: drilling vias and mounting holes could be done with almost the same hardware as pick & place. But full self-assembly will be orders of magnitude more difficult because of the need to move through several stations, potentially with manipulation in between. There you're getting into essentially small-scale factory design.
It'll be awesome when it happens though: An assembler that can autonomously create, "from scratch" (only basic components), another fully-functional assembler. That can create, "from scratch," yet another fully-functional assembler.
Just, uh, don't go combining all that with mobile resource foraging and extraction and an imperative to keep making copies.
- mahyarm 14y agoI think a more likely scenario is cities having little 'auto-factory' locations that have an automated machine shop create things for the neighborhood. They'll get shipments of raw materials, electronics and energy pipelines. These shops can assemble the robots for new shops and so on.