3 ms·
In Ethics class we would refer to this as a fallacy of relevance. Repeat after me "Be it resolved that two wrongs don't make a right."
by snapplebobapple 2y ago
In Ethics class we would refer to this as a fallacy of relevance. Repeat after me "Be it resolved that two wrongs don't make a right."
- harimau777 2y agoA better analogy is self defense. In the same way that it's not wrong to use violence against someone who is using violence against you, it's not wrong for people to band together to protect themselves against people exerting power over them.
- snapplebobapple 2y agoYou would be right if the government did not exist. unfortunately for your argument the government does exist and is the entity we have ceded most of our violence rights to. You are not in the kind of immediate and unforseen risk situation that would jistify return of those rights to you to ise so your analogy falls flat. Instead you are in the situation where the governmemt is responsible for regulating. So i say again, is weird they regulated one way for labor and another for business. Why is thug like abise ok for labor and not ok for business?it should be illegal for all.