> So much here is wrong I'm kind of astounded. Let me nitpick too: is this really an accurate statement? The first rebuttal (flipped homes) highlights an actu

> So much here is wrong I'm kind of astounded. Let me nitpick too: is this really an accurate statement? The first rebuttal (flipped homes) highlights an actual error, though does not comment on how this error impacts on the statement made by op. It's not clear whether the second statement really highlights any issues, since it is not made clear why 25% vs 30% would change the argument. Nor is referenced how many of the investors are private equity firms. So in summary I think your opening statement really doesn't hold, given the arguments you present. Would you disagree? Is this really more an emotional argument dressed in pseudo-factual language?