5 ms·
Yeah, he was almost certainly reusing his byte[]s. My takeaway is that if you program a high-level language as if it's C, expect C-like bugs.
by fizx 14y ago
Yeah, he was almost certainly reusing his byte[]s. My takeaway is that if you program a high-level language as if it's C, expect C-like bugs.
- i386 14y agoLikely reusing his directly allocated ByteBuffer and not checking the number of bytes that he filled it with. From what I remember, directly allocated ByteBuffers are not guaranteed to be zeroed.