3 ms·
You mock it, but implementations that allow people to do things if they're not a problem isn't awful if the police are fair, reasonable people who want the best
by oliwarner 2y ago
You mock it, but implementations that allow people to do things if they're not a problem isn't awful if the police are fair, reasonable people who want the best for their community.
I'd sooner have that than people being a pain in the arse because they're explicitly allowed to exercise rights at the cost of society.
Both concepts cut both ways.
- autoexec 2y ago> You mock it, but implementations that allow people to do things if they're not a problem isn't awful if the police are fair, reasonable people Seems like the smarter thing to do would be to outlaw "the problem" and not leave every single person's safety/freedom entirely up to the whims and benevolence of police.
- em-bee 2y agothat doesn't work because you can't define "the problem". creating a long list of cases where photography should be allowed and where it shouldn't would require the photographed person to prove that their photo falls into the cases that are a problem. that puts to much burden on them, and makes it more difficult to protect themselves. each person has a different feeling in how they are comfortable with having their pictures published. therefore the only sane thing to do is to give each individual the right to control that. it's like copyright. by default all rights are reserved, but i can give permission to copy if i wish.