3 ms·
"Intelligence", though difficult to scientifically define, is generally regarded as how quickly one grasps a novel situation, allowing one to come up with a sol
by kstenerud 2y ago
"Intelligence", though difficult to scientifically define, is generally regarded as how quickly one grasps a novel situation, allowing one to come up with a solution quicker than others could.
Although training in certain disciplines can help you score higher on intelligence tests by making the situations they test for less novel (and increase your "intelligence" as measured by the tests due to their foundational assumptions), it will do nothing to increase your actual intelligence - merely skew the results of the imperfect test a little bit.
That's not to say that training for an IQ test is a waste of time! A piece of paper showing a higher score is always valuable for getting ahead in society. And training to make large swaths of situations less novel makes you better able to navigate because now you have relevant experience (and thus require less intelligence to navigate successfully on your "first" try).
- illuminant 2y agoWhy assert that training does not increase actual intelligence? The application may be limited, yet even knowing and experiencing that is a degree of intelligence. I say [citizen] scientifically that intelligence is the mitigation of uncertainty. If it does not mitigate uncertainty it is not intelligence. All that other stuff you attached is on you. You are telling yourself things about intelligence which may be something else mixed in. "Quicker than others", "will do nothing", that inference is an inferior kind of intelligence, etc.