> if you pointed to actual data instead of just claiming things are not true I did. Follow that Washington Times link. > Pedantically arguing about numbers t

> if you pointed to actual data instead of just claiming things are not true I did. Follow that Washington Times link. > Pedantically arguing about numbers that don't have any correction of enough magnitude We are talking about an order of magnitude here. You claimed private equity owns more than 10x more homes than is.trur, because you believed the 44% figure straight away. > Are you saying that private equity and investors (and whatever nebulous definition people want to give that separates the two) own an acceptable amount of housing? Hard to define "acceptable", but yes, I believe around 30% of homes being owned by people other than those who live in them ok. Like, my mum, who owns exactly one property (for her eventual retirement, she gets housing through work right now) counts as an investor.