3 ms·
There are some early benchmarks which put its performance behind iPad: - Snapdragon X Elite (2,574 / 12,562) - iPad M4 (3,630 / 13,060)
by threeseed 2y ago
There are some early benchmarks which put its performance behind iPad:
- Snapdragon X Elite (2,574 / 12,562)
- iPad M4 (3,630 / 13,060)
- sspiff 2y agoWhat benchmark is this? Geekbench? Geekbench is notoriously inconsistent across platforms. Not saying the iPad chip isn't faster, but I wouldn't judge by Geekbench scores alone...
- TiredOfLife 2y agoDo you have a source for Geekbench 6 being inconsistent across platforms?
- Xeamek 2y agoWhat device was this benchmark run on?
- pavlov 2y agoSince we’re talking about Linux support, the iPad benchmarks seem irrelevant. It’s a completely different kernel. Asahi Linux benchmarks on an M3 MacBook Air would be the closest thing here.
- saagarjha 2y agoThis is a CPU benchmark, not a test of what OS is running on it.
- pavlov 2y agoIt’s common to have 5-10% differences on benchmarks between Linux and Windows on the same hardware. iPadOS is even more different (for example, no swap, and many other similar fundamental optimizations for single-app usage).
- saagarjha 2y agoIt seems very unlikely that Geekbench would swap
- schaefer 2y agoAccording to the asahi website, support is currently available for m1 and m2 macs only[1]. Time will tell about m3 macs. [1]: https://asahilinux.org/fedora/#device-support https://asahilinux.org/fedora/#device-support
- lozenge 2y agoYou can't benchmark a chip. It all depends on how much power and heat dissipation the actual device can provide. When the MacBook Pro comes out it should run circles round the iPad. And there are no Snapdragon X devices yet
- viraptor 2y agoSure you can. Measure performance when not thermally throttled and at the lowest speed / no boost. All real devices will fall in between those numbers.