3 ms·
The case was about building residential in a residential area. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep272/usrep272365/usrep272365.pdf http
by zbrozek 2y ago
The case was about building residential in a residential area.
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep272/usrep272365/usrep272365.pdf https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep...
- kjkjadksj 2y agoRead it again: "The recent industrial development of the City of Cleveland, following the railroad lines, has already reached the Village and to some extent extends over into it. In its obvious course, this industrial expansion will soon absorb the area in the Village for industrial enterprises. It is in restraint of this prospect that the ordinance seeks to operate. In effect it erects a dam to hold back the flood of industrial development and thus to preserve a rural character in portions of the Village which, under the operation of natural economic laws, would be devoted most profitably to industrial undertakings. This, the evidence shows, destroys value without compensation to the owners of lands who have acquired and are holding them for industrial uses." "...the ordinance of its own force operates greatly to reduce the value of appellee's lands and destroy their marketability for industrial, commercial and residential uses; and the attack is directed, not against any specific provision or provisions, but against the ordinance as an entirety."