> I wouldn't call anyone in the WEF a progressist. At least not because of that, since I consider the WEF a reactionary organisation. You're right. WEF is glob

> I wouldn't call anyone in the WEF a progressist. At least not because of that, since I consider the WEF a reactionary organisation. You're right. WEF is globalist. Recently there is a strong convergence between globalist and progressist narratives but yep they aren't the same. As I see the WEF and globalists in general are rich people buying their way into politics, stablishing a global financial elite in the seats of power. Do you consider it to be reactionary because it's in their interest to maintain the status quo?