4 ms·
I believe you’re right. You can easily transcribe audio but the quality of the text data is subpar to say the least. People are very messy when they speak and r
by throwthrowuknow 2y ago
I believe you’re right. You can easily transcribe audio but the quality of the text data is subpar to say the least. People are very messy when they speak and rely on the interlocutor to fill in the gaps. Training a model to understand all of the nuances of spoken dialogue opens that source of data up. What they demoed today is a model that to some degree understands tone, emotion and surprisingly a bit of humour. It’s hard to get much of that in text so it makes sense that audio is the key to it. Visual understanding of video is also promising especially for cause and effect and subsequently reasoning.