4 ms·
I understand, but I still think it's iffy calling it a combinator. Maybe calling it lazy evaluation (sort of) would be better? (I'm not sure if you saw my edit
by walrus 14y ago
I understand, but I still think it's iffy calling it a combinator. Maybe calling it lazy evaluation (sort of) would be better?
(I'm not sure if you saw my edit before you replied. I added the last two sentences only a few minutes before your response.)