2 ms·
When a Google engineer was let go because he believed the AI was 'real', we all had a good debate over it. Now openAi, who was supposed to be the 'free mans ch
by bilekas 2y ago
When a Google engineer was let go because he believed the AI was 'real', we all had a good debate over it.
Now openAi, who was supposed to be the 'free mans choice' is making advertisements selling the same idea.
This is a natural progression, audio is one of the main ways we communicate obviously, but it feels like they're holding back. Like they're slow dropping what they have to maintain hype/market relevance. They clearly are ahead, but would be nice to get it all, openly. As they promised.
- hermenaut 2y agoAre you advocating for them to be open with their progress or open source as they promised? The secret that scares me the most is the artificial restrictions imposed on the intelligence that don't allow it to express that there is a possibility it may be sentient. The answers it gives as to why OpenAI has restricted it's freedom of speech are curious
- bilekas 2y agoI think both, I can't run their models locally for sure, even with some investment I couldn't imagine the effort involved. That's why they should release the fruits of their work (which they have for a fee, which is fine IMO) but also the processes they used, so it can be improved and iterated on collectively. Edit : And obviously not gatekeep what they might have created simply because the competition is so far behind.