4 ms·
This is such a charade. Making "invisible" airtags is trivial [1], and I wouldn't be surprised if such airtags are being manufactured en-masse. We allowed the
by winterdeaf 2y ago
This is such a charade. Making "invisible" airtags is trivial [1], and I wouldn't be surprised if such airtags are being manufactured en-masse.
We allowed the creation of a global tracking network under the false pretense of privacy. The entire Find My security model falls apart when considering "malicious" tags, and Apple knew about this from the start.
[1]: https://github.com/Guinn-Partners/esp32-airtag https://github.com/Guinn-Partners/esp32-airtag
- foota 2y agoIn that case, couldn't someone just make a tracker tag using GPS and a mobile connection?
- emayljames 2y agothese devices are way more insidious though, a gps/mobile tracker would have more limitations due to it being less able to be hidden and less mobile.
- wepple 2y agoGPS+mobile tracker: - 4x the cost plus ongoing fees - 2x larger - can’t buy it at any big box store - relies on a third party who can also see what you’re tracking - battery limited to weeks, not years Accessibility and features make these way more compelling
- PaulStatezny 2y agoHave you heard the term "defense in depth"? In the security world, it seems accepted that no security effort is a silver bullet that's 100% impossible to get around. Rather, it seems best practice to compose many layers of security efforts, which all work to raise the level of effort an attacker is required to exploit people. So I think it's unfair to say this is a charade.