3 ms·
It's twice as fast/cheap relative to GPT-4-turbo, which is still expensive compared to GPT-3.5-turbo and Claude Haiku. https://openai.com/api/pricing/ https://
by minimaxir 2y ago
It's twice as fast/cheap relative to GPT-4-turbo, which is still expensive compared to GPT-3.5-turbo and Claude Haiku.
https://openai.com/api/pricing/ https://openai.com/api/pricing/
- c0t300 2y agobut better afaik
- minimaxir 2y agoBut may not be better enough to warrant the cost difference. LLM cost econonmics are complicated.
- BeetleB 2y agoFor commercial use at scale, of course cost matters. For the average Joe programmer like me, GPT4 is already "dirt cheap". My typical monthly bill is $0-3 using it as much as I like. The one time it was high was when I had it take 90+ hours of Youtube video transcripts, and had it summarize each video according to the format I wanted. It produced about 250 pages of output. That month I paid $12-13. Well worth it, given the quality of the output. And now it'll be less than $7. For the average Joe, it's not expensive. Fast food is.