3 ms·
The big ones probably not, but I extended and ran my fast-hash generator just this year again, with new ideas and new builtin op codes, and the results didn't c
by rurban 2y ago
The big ones probably not, but I extended and ran my fast-hash generator just this year again, with new ideas and new builtin op codes, and the results didn't change since at all. You need to find a combination of fast and good-enough hashes.
But fast string search changed a lot in the last decade. The previous winners were all taken over by a new two-way algorithm as implemented in musl. This was a surprise. search is definitely more important than inthash. Maybe glibc will catchup in the next decade.