3 ms·
> have the "greater good" intentions, It's getting harder and harder to tell because bot activity has gotten so good, but Matthew Green has been around a while
by ants_everywhere 2y ago
> have the "greater good" intentions,
It's getting harder and harder to tell because bot activity has gotten so good, but Matthew Green has been around a while and is a genuine old school crypto dude. There is a group of people who just believes that crypto and privacy are good things and want to promote them.
The reason it gets harder is because you can spin up a handful of "expert" accounts shilling for this or that privacy VPN or bitcoin scam etc. So it's hard to just pull up a list of statements and know whether it has any weight. In this case, Matthew Green has a lot of weight because I've followed him for a while and I know what he's about.
- cryptoboy2283 2y ago> There is a group of people who just believes that crypto and privacy are good things and want to promote them. Doesn't mean one can't become a sellout eventually. Especially in Green's particular case - he had invested a lot of attention to Margaret Salter, e.g. https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/1357890731369709571 https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/13578907313697095...