3 ms·
Agree, its painful to browse and read. Feels almost intentionally obtuse. They'd be much better off with the stacked pages style of Andy M [1] and obsidian publ
by npunt 2y ago
Agree, its painful to browse and read. Feels almost intentionally obtuse. They'd be much better off with the stacked pages style of Andy M [1] and obsidian publish [2]
[1] https://notes.andymatuschak.org/ https://notes.andymatuschak.org/
[2] https://obsidian.md/publish https://obsidian.md/publish
- the_other 2y ago> style of Andy M As I go forward through the stack, the rendering works fine and as expected. When I go back through it, the “previous” page renders two or three times. It’s possible the first paint is a cached page image from my browser, but why does the site then render the page I’m leaving briefly before rendering the page I was heading back to. Just as with C2, there’s some client-side rendering system running that seems to provide no runtime benefit over plain old HTML. All these sites need is text and links.