2 ms·
rsh relies on the client host to not lie, that's quite a different level of guarantee than touching a Yubikey.
by yencabulator 3y ago
rsh relies on the client host to not lie, that's quite a different level of guarantee than touching a Yubikey.
- augusto-moura 2y agoOk, I get what you mean rlogin and rsh are not safe because of inumerous legacy problems. But I think you get what I meant as well, authorization problems can be solved without SSH. I said that even rsh would do because will can ignore all the weird outdated stuff and just login with an user and password, same as a local login. In that case telnet would also work. However, I truly believe that cryptographic keys are way superior to passwords. And going back to them would be a huge step back